Tuesday, October 29, 2019
Supply Chain Management at World Co. Ltd. Essay Example for Free
 Supply Chain Management at World Co. Ltd. Essay  Industry Facts:  Specialty Retailing Sector -Women’s apparel industry in Japan seasonal industry  products have short life cycles and extremely uncertain demand International Competition  3 Distribution Alternatives- company-owned stand alone stores, shops in fashion malls, and shops within department stores â€Å"store-within-a-store†  Company Facts  Operates in women’s apparel industry  Company uses both wholesale and retail distribution methods Wholesale items are sold in other stores (retailers)  Specialty store Private-label apparel (SPA) merchandise which includes the OZOC and Untitled brands was sold at stores owned by World Uses SPARCS, a business process system that allows World to monitor sales trends and focus on customer demand to maximize the efficiency of store support operations By late 1990’s World sold over 40 different brands in approximately 7,000 shops and stores World’s divisions are organized by product (brand name)  1998- World Employed 2,394 workers  Net sales $1.8 billion and net income of $32million  Company held a 3.5% share of the Japanese apparel market  Major U.S. competitors are Gap Inc., The Limited  Rooted in Domestic Manufacturing  Brand Facts  Targeted at female customers 25-29 years of age  Annual Sales 2.2 million  Introduce new collections twice annually (Spring-Summer; Fall-Winter) Introduced New Products Every 2 Weeks  At the end of 1998, Untitled Brand could be Found in 110 Stores  Qualitative Analysis  Industry Analysis:  Threats:  Lack of Channel Power  Uncertain Demand  Seasonality  Inventory Risk  Opportunities  Fewer Variations In Store Assortments  Fast Changing Fashion Trends (Social)  Low Inventory Levels  International Manufacturing  Company Analysis  Strengths  World’s High Inventory Turns (5/year) (Operations)  47% Gross Margin  Keen Competitive Intelligence- reviewed competitor’s brands every six months (Marketing) Decentralized Merchandising Operations- each brand was autonomous (Operations/Marketing) High Responsiveness (Operations)  Versatile Line Workers  Recruited talented individuals who were unafraid of change and could motivate others (Management) Weaknesses  Weak Pay-for-Performance System (Management)  Low Brand Awareness  Left over inventory is markdown 50%  Quantitative Analysis:  Wholesale net sales=(total net ales- net spa sales) ¥1,643,130,000 World’s private label spa brands  ¥250,000,000  Net Sales Of World Corporation ¥1,893,130,000  Cost of Sales  ¥983,610,000  Gross Profit Margin at 47%  ¥909,520,000  World’s private label Spa brandsNet Sales:  ¥250,000,000 SPA’s Cost of Goods sold:  ¥130,500,00 Purchases @ 97% ¥126,585,000  Other ¥ 3,415,000  G. M. of Spa brands at 47.8% of Sales Gross Margin:  ¥119,500,000  Cost of Goods sold include merchandise inventory, purchases, (purchase discounts), total merchandise available for sale  Average Inventory for World Co., Limited and SPA Brands  World Co., Limited  Average Inventory = Cost of Goods sold =  ¥983,610,000 =  ¥$96,722,000  Inventory Turns 5 times a years  SPA Brands  Average Inventory = Cost of Goods sold =  ¥130,500,000 =  ¥15,294,117.65  Inventory Turns 8.5 times a years  Cost to Retail Ratio  Problems  How to overcome Bargaining power of suppliers- retailers charge high prices for retail space Poor implementation of push (or pull) strategy  Inventory Markdowns is second greatest variable expense accounting 24.10% of total Sales staff does not enter shipments into the computer upon receipt How to overcome compromised information accuracy during semi-annual sales    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.